California Harassment Referendum (CAHR) - Defined
ARTICLE 1 DECLARATION OF RIGHTS
All people are by nature free and independent and have inalienable rights. Among these are enjoying and defending life and liberty, acquiring, possessing, and protecting property, and pursuing and obtaining safety, happiness, and privacy.
Privacy Laws Defined (646.X): Any time a rational person would feel violated, harassed or acts violating the above article and according to the stated in our Declaration of Independence as well as under the 9th amendment of the Constitution of the United States, we all have a right to privacy. When this inalienable rightt is violated, it is in fact criminal harassment. Several laws to be amended, expanded and enacted provocation and expand self defense laws, castle laws, NJ (assembly #153precedents (et al.)
Harassment Defined: [No longer only a civil matter, but a criminal statute as well and CA PC 527 (B) and 527.6 (including restraining orders) to be redefined and amended.] PC 646.x
When an individual [perpetrator/harasser/stalker/aggressor or the like] targets another individual, with or without their knowledge or prejudice [however prejudices will include and not be limited to violation of civil rights acts and are subjected to felony hate crimes (including hate speech) in addition to harassment (et al.) laws] and conducts unwanted acts where that individual's rights - the 'harasee' (the person being violated of their human rights, dignities and freedoms as well as pursuit of happiness (et al)) and/or freedoms are threatened by annoyances, threats, behavior that is intended to annoy, harass, alarm, torment, terrorize, where behavior is violating in nature (for example when a man sits next to a woman in a public space targeting her and then staring at her, let along inappropriately at her physical figure where it's obviously intentional and sexual in nature and clearly violates one's freedoms and human dignities by being objectified and clearly violated in a sexual nature by a predator. One that has experienced this is quite clearly being predatorial and obviously inappropriate.
for example if person shows they told the person - and person continued to harass, annoy, etc. then this would be grounds of the person being afflicted/affected by adverse effects intended to harass and annoy person. Restraining order would be warranted and granted at state’s cost via harasser.
Temporary Restraining Orders (TROs) and the like to be amended as well as civil definition CA PC 527.6 (and subsection B) defining harassment as new definition above.
Sexual Harassment Defined: “repeated, unsolicited verbal or physical contact of a sexual nature which is threatening in character.” (US Code, 1720D of Title 38).” There currently is no Penal Code in California for criminal harassment or sexual harassment. There is sexual battery, which is touching against someone's will and is a form of sexual abuse even if someone approaches and touches your hair, this will allow you to hit em' in the balls, legally and welcome him to the new world where one no longer enables his criminal behavior.
Due to the sexual nature, which sex being typically the motive to dehumanize and harass people by mostly men whom are sociopathic in nature as they objectify women and do not look at them as human as our patriarch society has enabled and encouraged in our community, including male police officers that too enable rapists, perverts and the perpetrator's they personally can identify. The stats are simple, 97% of rapists will never serve one day in jail and 1/2500 are ever prosecuted.
obscene, lewd, lascivious persons of an 'easy target' nature, authority/opportunistic = double count
obscene and/or sexual subsection as harsher law imposed = double count felony
For example, a male nurse works in an autistic home where he take care of a bunch of folks with profound cases of autism and he rapes them, or the more profound cases where he knows to target them because their case is a profound one and there's no one to tell and possibly is a mute, so the 'creep' targets those cases to allude everyone. More malicious in nature by hiding the behavior and targeting some person with an obvious disadvantage, child, disabled or the like.
Some interesting facts from http://invisiblewarmovie.com/ - This is a documentary about rape being enabled and allowed to go on in the military with both men and women being the victims and how they are retaliated and some even ‘black-listed’ from their VA benefits. “In 2010, approximately 55% of women and 38% of men reported that their assailant sexually harassed [and/] or stalked them prior to the incident of rape or sexual assault."
"The Veterans Administration (VA) spends approximately $10,880 on healthcare costs per military sexual assault survivor. Adjusting for inflation, this means that in 2011 alone, the VA spent almost $900 million dollars on sexual assault-related healthcare expeditures.Source: Service Women’s Action Network (SWAN); June, 2011; Brittany L. Stalsburg”